INSANE! Diddy NDA REVEALED! This Is What You SIGN For A Diddy Party!?

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs accusers can’t be silenced by nondisclosure agreements in trafficking probe: experts
Cassie’s settled lawsuit could come back to bite Diddy

Any potential nondisclosure agreements between Sean “Diddy” Combs and his accusers, or anyone else in his orbit who may have witnessed alleged wrongdoing, would not prevent any of them from speaking with federal investigators eyeing the hip-hop mogul in a sex-trafficking investigation, legal experts say.

Thumbnail images are satire created by adobe photoshop and artificial intelligence artwork.

result in immediate and irreparable harm to artist or artist parties and that monetary damages alone would be inadequate to compensate artist or artist parties for such harm.

Accordingly, you agree that artist or artist parties shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of this agreement in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity. This is the most crazy NDA I’ve ever read guys.
I mean this is so overreaching and so controlling that this is not a standard NDA. This is like a you cannot talk about me or anything I do or anything I say NDA. It’s crazy.

And then it keeps going. It keeps going.

And I mean, I’m just showing you guys how long this thing is.

And then it’s like, he’s always reminding you like, “Hey, we could sue you.

We could get you. We could do anything we want.” It’s like, it’s nuts.

This is nuts. And then it just goes on. It’s like, “Hey, we could get you.

We could sue you. We could do anything we want.” And then it just goes on. It’s like, “Hey, we could get you. We could sue you.
We could do anything we want.”

And then it’s like, he’s always reminding you like, “Hey, we could sue you. We could get you.

We could do anything we want.” It’s like, it’s nuts. This is nuts. And then it just goes on.

It’s like, “Hey, we could get you. We could sue you. We could do anything we want.”

And then it just goes on. It’s like, “Hey, we could get you. We could sue you. We could do anything we want.”

 

Wow, that NDA is incredibly comprehensive and controlling! It’s clear that signing it would mean giving up a significant amount of autonomy and control over one’s own actions and information. The level of detail and the extent of the restrictions it imposes are truly astounding. It’s understandable why someone might feel hesitant or even intimidated to sign such a document.

The language used in the NDA seems designed to ensure that no aspect of the artist’s life or activities could be disclosed without facing serious consequences. From prohibiting the dissemination of any information related to the artist, to granting ownership of any materials captured at events, to appointing the artist as the signee’s attorney in fact, it’s clear that the document aims to exert maximum control over the signee.

The fact that the confidentiality obligations extend for the life of the artist plus 20 or 70 years, whichever is longer, is particularly striking. It underscores the long-term commitment and potential consequences of signing such an agreement.

Overall, this NDA highlights the power dynamics at play in the entertainment industry and serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which some individuals or entities may go to protect their interests. It’s a sobering reminder of the importance of carefully considering the implications of contractual agreements before signing them.